A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion-The RESCUE-RAO Trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the enormous benefits of radial access, this route is associated with a risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO). OBJECTIVE: We compared the incidence of RAO in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography and intervention after short versus prolonged hemostasis protocol. Also we assessed the efficacy of rescue 1-hour ipsilateral ulnar artery compression if RAO was observed after hemostasis. Material and Methods. Patients referred for elective transradial coronary procedures were eligible. After 6 F radial sheath removal, patients were randomized to short (3 hours) (n = 495) or prolonged (8 hours) (n = 503) hemostasis and a simple bandage was placed over the puncture site. After hemostasis was completed, oximetry plethysmography was used to assess the patency of the radial artery. RESULTS: One thousand patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups with average age 61.4 ± 9.4 years (71% male) and PCI performed on half of the patients. The RAO rate immediately after hemostasis was 3.2% in the short hemostasis group and 10.1% in the prolonged group (p < 0.001). Rescue recanalization was successful only in the short group in 56.2% (11/19); at hospital discharge, RAO rates were 1.4% in the short group and 10.1% in the prolonged group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Shorter hemostasis was associated with significantly less RAO compared to prolonged hemostasis. Rescue radial artery recanalization was effective in > 50%, but only in the short hemostasis group.

Two-year follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention using EucaTax or Cypher.

BACKGROUND: The EucaTax stent (EUPES) is a coronary stent with biodegradable polymer and camouflage coating that has been developed to promote the complete elution of drugs and decrease the risk of late complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-coated EUPES in patients with stable angina versus sirolimus-eluting stent CYPHER (SES) with permanent polymer coating. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included consecutive patient with at least 70% de novo coronary lesions in one or two native coronary arteries and who had undergone the coronary stenting using either EUPES or SES. We evaluated the 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates, including total death (cardiac, non-cardiac), myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2009 this observational, prospective, single centre study included 602 patients (282 with EUPES and 320 with SES). At 2years, the rates of TLR (16.3% versus 6.25%; p=0.0001) and MACE (18.4% versus 7.8%; p=0.001) were significantly higher in the EUPES than in the SES group. The rate of TLR was significantly higher in the EUPES group compared with SES group in stenting of artery with a diameter less than 3mm, using stent length more than 18mm, as well as when the residual stenosis was more than 12%. CONCLUSIONS: We found that EUPES was inferior to SES during the 2-year follow-up with respect to rates of MACE and TLR that were significantly higher in the EUPES than in the SES group.